> Ron's view that Hitler was moral & Chris's view that censorship in a > democracy is right, should not go unchallenged. Otherwise, it is the > death knell of the MoQ. > Craig
Yeah, because that's what I said. By the Gods, have you been listening to Platt? Furthermore, a "democracy" is nothing that it is carved in stone tablets how it should work, but one could argue that if a decision is taken, democratically, for example that censorship should be instituted. Why, the that is a democratic decision. It's a paradox, I know, and from a MOQ perspective one can argue that censorship would strangle intellectual development, but one can also argue that censorship may be necessary so as to keep society stable - for a solid base for the intellectual level to rest on. One last thing. In many democratic countries it is forbidden to express certain political agendas (Nazi stuff etc) - a censorship, for the good of the people. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
