Bo now:
I did not get my reply to Craig off before Ron's fired (his dud) 
from the hip. Have you guys been sleeping in class? All static 
levels are MORAL levels  The two lower levels 
are so old that we just regard them as a-moral, but the social and 
intellectual levels are still "fighting it out". 

Ron:
But what does MORAL mean to you? Is moral "struggle"
Or "domination"?

Bo:
The social level is often seen as morality itself because that 
level's moral is presented as divine commandments. But social 
value are basically duty to the common cause and in Hitler's case 
he managed to make Nazism the said cause, hence the atrocities 
to promote it. But these things only became atrocities (immoral) 
seen from intellect.
Had the social level been "all there was" 
Nazism would have written the history and the world would have 
bowed over, but as it were intellect were the rising power (Nazism 
can be seen as social value's "last stand") and USA - fired by 
intellectually moral condemnation - threw itself against the Axis 
powers. (I disregard all war facts here, that USA was attacked 
and declared war upon ...etc.) 

Ron:
American Intellectual morals condemned Nazi Social morals,
What are intellectual morals? I missed this part asleep drooling
On my test paper. Are you speaking of Christian philosophy?












   




Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to