Ian, 

      I posted this quote of Rayner after I browsed
through his website when I linked to it via your post
on Feb. 19 in the [MD] Art for our sakes ? as follows:


[MD] Art for our sakes ?
ian glendinning psybertron at gmail.com 
Tue Feb 19 08:52:44 PST 2008

"Take a look at this beautiful anthology of poems and
art works from Alan Rayner.
http://www.inclusional-research.org/furtherreading.php
"
etc...

SA continues:  I've browsed his website before via
your introduction in the past.  I see you contribute
in his dicussion group at times.  By the way, I posted
this quote below in this same thread in Feb.


blue, very very blue - very warm, amazingly warm,
SA

Ian:
> I didn't see that SA quote. Which thread was it ? I
> can't find it.
> (I ask because DM and I have been dropping Alan
> Rayner links into
> these mails for a couple of years, and this is the
> first time I've
> seen anyone make the connection.)
> Excellent to see some traction.
> Ian
> 
> On 3/3/08, Jorge Goldfarb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > SA wrote (Feb. 24) quoting Alan Rayner:
> >
> >     "But that is precisely what rationalistic
> logic,
> > based ultimately on the exclusion of "space" as
> "void
> > nothing" from "matter" as "definite something",
> has
> > been persuading us to try vainly to "do" for
> > millennia, whilst becoming ever more deeply
> entrenched
> > in our philosophical, mathematical and scientific
> > foundations. The fundamental premise of this logic
> ?
> > the existence of independently definable and
> > quantifiable objects ? lies in an idealized
> freezing
> > out of "imperfection" (i.e. "space") from discrete
> and
> > regularized geometrical form, constrained within a
> > three-dimensional box extended to infinity.
> >     This abstract imposition of discontinuity by
> > definition neither takes account of nor does
> justice
> > to contemporary scientific findings and real life
> > experience of the dynamic continuity of natural
> flow.
> > Yet it continues to be defended most zealously by
> > those whose claim to authority rests in what they
> > regard as disinterested objective observation and
> > evidence. It also leads to the deep paradox,
> conflict,
> > waste and damage that arises through dislocating
> > "self" from "neighbourhood", making us believe in
> an
> > unsustainable, competitive struggle for existence
> and
> > individual perfection that is at odds with the
> > variability of the natural world that both
> sustains
> > and includes us.
> >     The scientific beginnings of the ending of
> this
> > dislocation, and associated recovery in awareness
> of
> > our dynamically continuous natural geometry, have
> > emerged with the advent of relativity, quantum
> > mechanics and non-linear dynamical systems theory.
> All
> > these theories signify, in one way or another, the
> > inextricability of space from matter in a fluid
> > dynamic cosmos of energy flow."
> >
> >         -    Alan Rayner
> >
> >         -
> > http://www.inclusional-research.org/spacetime.php
> > +++++++++++++
> >
> >     Thanks, SA, for bringing up the above quote
> and
> > the link to the website of the  Inclusional
> Research
> > group. Quite a lot of interesting materials in
> there.
> >
> >        On reading those texts I was wondering how
> MOQ
> > could connect with their views on Space. In this
> forum
> > there seems to be a lot of concern about DQ
> in-time;
> > this to judge from the many posts on
> static/dynamic,
> > etc. What about DQ in-space? Seems an interesting
> > field of exploration; not in Newtonian (absolute)
> > space but in Space as understood by people in the
> > Inclusional group.
> >
> >       Perhaps this has been discussed before in
> > MOQdiscuss? I wrote "inclusional" in the Search
> box
> > with zero results.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     
>
___________________________________________________________
> > Rise to the challenge for Sport Relief with Yahoo!
> For Good
> >
> > http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> >
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 


      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to