SA > SA: Well, I thought you would leave Zen out of this > discussion? Zen is a way to experience quality. Zen > is simple living. Are you trying to complicate events > by picking and choosing what's best for you, is best > for everybody else? What do you have against Zen? In > a world of quality, Zen surely is.
I have nothing against Zen. I practice Zen. I will not talk about it, because as Pirsig put it: Everything you say about Zen is a lie. I might say that Zen is a way of getting closer to Dynamic Quality, but it wouldn't be right. No words should be added. No thoughts. The MOQ is a thought system, and thus just as far from (and as close to) Zen as anything else. But what I feel, is that if you wish to practice Zen. Do. If you wish do develop the Metaphysics called MOQ - do. Nothing say's you can't do both. I do. See - this is why I don't want to talk about Zen, because if I now say, like I thought that "they are not the same" I would be lying, from a Zen point of view surely, and perhaps from a MOQ view as well.. Just - just say that the MOQ is a Theory that we are all working on, and that may work as a Good theory. Try as I might, I can't say more. Regards Chris Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
