[SA] I've always liked your posts on this topic. I don't boil it all down to things that wiggle and those things that are still, but whatever we boil events down to it seems not many people 'get it', but why 'get it' when what you said boiling from 'wiggles and stillness' is enlightening overall. Good to have you back for the time being. I think your scientific input will help some of the newcomers understand this angle on the moq. Their questions need some good answers. :-)
[Krimel] Thanks for your kind words. I am of course attempting to grossly oversimplify but I tend to think that if it won't fit on a bumper sticker it will not be generally understood. [SA] P.S. We've spoken about this before. And I see the whole level system of the moq goes into cycles of too much usage and thus becomes overrated by the overstimulation on this (the level system) detail. It gets a bit tedious at times. This is a helpful system, but it is not the whole moq [Krimel] I think Pirsig gives us 'a' set of levels not 'THE' set of levels. They are of heuristic not metaphysical value. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
