> [Krimel]
> I think Pirsig gives us 'a' set of levels not 'THE'
> set of levels. They are
> of heuristic not metaphysical value.
SA: I certainly agree. As of recent, the whole
what's intellect and what's social has turned into
who's better than who, who's philosophy is better.
Recently, by a number less than a handful of forum
disscussioners, the intellectual level is theirs and
theirs alone, and if they don't like your
intellectualizing, then they automatically identify
one as being on the social level, thus, making
themselves more moral. This 'more moral' is what
Ron's been discussing in his pointing out that this
kind of approach in the forum is where some believe
they are more superior than others and they won, games
over, they have the answer and everybody else is a
loser, etc, etc... You've seen this here before. It
usually starts when newcomers enter and they begin
asking questions, and then it seems to start all over
again. At least that's what I've noticed thus far.
I'm really going to have to keep that in mind -
the levels are 'a' tool, not 'the' tool. Good point.
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
