On Mar 9, 2008, at 4:22 AM, MarshaV wrote: > > Greetings Dwai, > > There is no way not to get yourself into trouble by talking about > these things. Undesirable implies desirable (even set up as a double > negative), completeness implies incompleteness.
Indeed. That is the realization that needs to dawn (at various levels, at various degrees and so on and so forth...). After it has, we're on our own -- no intellectual framework can move us beyond that intellectual realization. And that is just the beginning of it all -- then you start verifying -- physically, psychically, spiritually. > > IT is what IT is. IT would be human reality? Awareness of reality > is existence? Is it better to exist than not? What do you think > Dwai? Is better to dance about these things? Who knows? I don't know since my dualistic being has no awareness of being non-existent. Maybe I never was non-existent, that's why... Like you and Krimel and his nice little doggie, I've been around since eternity. So since I haven't been aware of being non-existent, why dance around these things...skirt around this HUGE fact that lurks beneath the surface of things. So I do the only thing I can do -- try to remember and physically know that I am that Eternity...just like you and Krimel and his dog. Don't you think it's better to do this than simply live in the ghost- world of our predilections and psychoses? Regards, Dwai Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
