At 04:14 PM 3/8/2008, you wrote: >[Marsha] >There is mundane morality. "Man (She holds her nose as she writes >the word.) is the measure of all things." The MOQ has produced an >intellectual structure on which to make moral decisions. Ahh, but >then there is Quality, the undifferentiated aesthetic continuum, the >Tao, the ALL which cannot be undesirable and is perfect, good and >moral as it is. The mundane (good and bad) is also this Quality and >is therefore perfect, good and moral. Or as Dwai states, "... cannot >possibly be undesirable." > >[Krimel] >Isn't desire the root of all evil for Buddhists? Is Dwai saying in effect >the 'all that is' is evil? Or that good is evil? Is this one of those koanic >paradoxes or should I go kill my dog? >
Arf! Arf! Arf! I would think (arf!) desire on the mundane level is undersirable. Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
