At 09:54 AM 3/9/2008, you wrote: >On Mar 9, 2008, at 4:22 AM, MarshaV wrote: > > > > > Greetings Dwai, > > > > There is no way not to get yourself into trouble by talking about > > these things. Undesirable implies desirable (even set up as a double > > negative), completeness implies incompleteness. > >Indeed. That is the realization that needs to dawn (at various >levels, at various degrees and so on and so forth...). After it has, >we're on our own -- no intellectual framework can move us beyond that >intellectual realization. And that is just the beginning of it all -- >then you start verifying -- physically, psychically, spiritually. > > > > > IT is what IT is. IT would be human reality? Awareness of reality > > is existence? Is it better to exist than not? What do you think > > Dwai? Is better to dance about these things? > >Who knows? I don't know since my dualistic being has no awareness of >being non-existent. Maybe I never was non-existent, that's why... >Like you and Krimel and his nice little doggie, I've been around >since eternity. So since I haven't been aware of being non-existent, >why dance around these things...skirt around this HUGE fact that >lurks beneath the surface of things. So I do the only thing I can do >-- try to remember and physically know that I am that Eternity...just >like you and Krimel and his dog. > >Don't you think it's better to do this than simply live in the ghost- >world of our predilections and psychoses? >
Yes. Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
