> [Krimel] > But without 'n' X goes unnoticed. Are you just not paying attention here? > Why is it so hard for you to acknowledge that individuals are important > but in the context of the group? What meaning does 'first' have outside of
> its social context? [Platt] First has no meaning without a second, third, fourth, etc., just as one has no meaning without many. Those are givens. What seems hard for you to acknowledge is individuals we're talking about are human beings, not ants. [Krimel] This has never been hard for me to acknowledge. But that is about as close to recognition of the importance of the social context as I have heard from you so I'll just hold there. Give it time to sink in. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
