Who's on first again? - I don't know, third base...
wooooooo.
This is a good discussion, and Arlo and Krimel are
bringing up excellent points, I couldn't resist
throwing in a little Abbott and Costello though with
all this first, second, and third talk.
SA
P.S. Here's some funny 'who's on first' routines:
Star Wars:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVjrwyYGu2Q
Two martial artists fighting out the who's on
first:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqvyKmiVrVI&feature=related
anyways...
> [Platt]
> Thanks for backing up Pirsig (and me): "A tribe can
> change its values only
> person by person and someone has to be first." X is
> first, then Y, Z, P, Q
> and X+n -- each individual person by person. But
> without the primacy of
> inventor X, the rest could never follow.
> [Krimel]
> But without 'n' X goes unnoticed. Are you just not
> paying attention here?
> Why is it so hard for you to acknowledge that
> individuals are important but
> in the context of the group? What meaning does
> 'first' have outside of its
> social context?
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
