Quoting ARLO J BENSINGER JR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Let's take this one point at a time... > > [Platt] > So what Ferrero said was untrue? In your eyes that makes her a moron, a > buffoon > and a sad little woman threatened by those different from herself. > > [Arlo] > Yes, it does make her these things. Again, I ask, what if she had said "the > only reason the republicans had nominated McCain is that he is a white man"? > What would your response have been? Would you have considered this remark > "racist"?
Glad to hear you consider a former candidate for vice president of the U.S. a moron. If you ask me, that makes you a candidate for the funny farm. We know you are already a member of loony left. > [Platt] > Well at last, an admittance of the "guns of government" which you are > perfectly > willing to employ to force redistribution of income. What a neolib socialist > you are! > > [Arlo] > Ooo, great. Talk-radio rubbish. Who'd have thought. But let's stick to the > point. You place greater value on "peace" than my freedom to ride as I choose. Your freedom to ride as you choose is limited by the racket you make, just as your freedom to set off fireworks in a residential neighborhood is limited. > Again proving not only your rhetorical hypocrisy, but that you have no trouble > relying on the "guns of government" when it suits you. I've never claimed to > despise or be against governance and infrastructure. I have no problem with > laws restricting my pipes (maybe you missed the sarcasm in my posts), to a > degree. Its all about balance. So, you don't object to obeying the muffler laws that apply to cars. Is that correct? Good. > And again, what constitutes "forced > redistribution of income"? Public parks? Public libraries? Roads? Or only > "welfare"? What about your forcing me to pay for a war I may not believe in? > Is > that "immoral" on your behalf? Or arrogance that "you know what's best for > me"? Redistribution of income means forcibly taking from one person to take care of another -- better known as socialism. Are you saying you won't pay for those who are dedicated to defending your country from its enemies and willing to give up their lives to do so? Sure sounds like it. > [Platt] > If smoke bothers you, you can walk away. > > [Arlo] > What if people are smoking on the public sidewalk in front of my house, and > the > smoke comes into my house? Can I then use the government to outlaw smoking > near > my property? What if I live in a townhome or apartment and my neighbors are > Korean who cook with all kinds of aromatic spices? Am I allowed to outlaw what > they cook because I can't "walk away" from the smell? If you can convince a majority of your fellow citizens to pass such a stupid law, be my guest. > [Platt] > People are not free to walk away from their sick children who are blasted into > wakefulness after hours of trying to get them to sleep by the blast of your > motorcycle. That you don't care is shameful, but expected. > > [Arlo] > So if your "sick child" is awoken by the scent of BBQ coming from your > neighbor's yard, this is something you feel you could outlaw? What an absurd hypothetical. Answer this: Why are there muffler laws? > I've done my best here to ignore your moronic talk-radio commentary. See if > you > can actually answer these questions without resorting to such embarrassing > tactics. What tactics? You keep talking about the evils of talk radio without ever defining those evils in any way that makes the least bit of sense. We know you neolibs would love to banish conservative talk radio, not because of any tactics, but because it is against your socialist political agenda. ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
