>
> Ron:
> no room for any argument there. I guess I was saying that getting
> caught up in possibility/probability is indulging in memory/projection
> function rather than any sort of objective Quantitative science.
DM: Very very wrong I believe, as quantum thoery superimposes waves of
possibility/probability
to work out how systems are objectively behaving. Yet the mathematics is
referring to & superimposing nothing
actual only possibilities. See Prigogine's discussion in his The End of
Certainty.
Ron;
I agree, If you read the post pervious to this I explain this comment,
They are mathematical equations to predict the trajectory of particles.
It is based on what we already know about water and sound.
But as scientists say, this only somewhat successfully predicts
What they are observing, it is unknown whether particles actually
Do behave as waves.
But it is important to realized it is a tool for understanding
And prediction.
I was stating that to get caught up in metaphysical conversations
About it one must realize that it is just that, a tool for understanding
Not the actual function of reality itself.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
