> [Krimel]
> > What good is a system of morals based on levels when the hierarchy of
> > levels provides no guidance as to which level has moral priority?
>
> [Craig]
> The hierarchy of levels is the moral priority (see "Lila").
>
> [Krimel]
> I have already rephrased this question three times. In the cases of Easter
> Island and Haiti societies destroyed themselves by deforesting the
> respective islands. Social values dominated biological one. The MoQ value
> hierarchy would say morality was served.

[IG] 
And maybe it was in the grand scheme of things. They're only
small islands - fractions of the human cosmos, with only a small
fraction of the intellectual level available to make that connection
between the biological (trees) and their own biological and social
needs  - and other members of the greater cosmos (ie you) were able to
learn that lesson.

[Krimel]
I don't really see how the grand scheme matters here. Morality is not
expressed on such a scale but in individual acts. The islands were denuded
one tree at a time in service to the cooking needs of individuals with the
approval of the social system.

> Krimel
> I would suggest that the 'levels' provide no guidance to morality at all 
> and that what is at issue is balance and harmony among conflicting forces
> regardless of taxonomy or position in the taxonomy.

[IG]
The problem with your example was two conflicting biological patterns
- humans and trees are biologically dependent (in ways that weren't
understood by the participants), before we get to look for more subtle
social / intellectual level patterns.

[Krimel]
If morality is to provide a guide to action or a way to judge action but
first you have to settle an argument over what level things are on I suspect
not much will get done and even less will get done right.

[IG]
I think what you highlight is not a so much a problem with MoQ, but a
problem with (some) people expecting simplistic / normative /
prescriptive rules to automagically pop out of it, without
understanding, explanation and enlightenment.

[Krimel]
Precisely!

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to