OK, sorry, there were two points mixed up together SA. One aimed at agreeing with you one aimed at agreeing with Chris.
Point (1) Dalai Lama is a role, not a person. (He is a basically nice person, his role is some added complication.) Point (2) Arguments intended to produce winners and losers (eg Chris' "cowboys and indians") are destructive - and I avoid them except when pragmatically necessary. If those are clear, ask which other specific thing I said is unintelligible ;-) Being unintelligible is a common problem I have - ie I was saying I was NOT offended by your remark. Regards Ian Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
