Chris, Bo and Steven
I pretty much agree with Bo about 4 (until he starts preaching about SOL
of course). I think the wording was something like, "There are many ways
to divide reality", which doesn't yet assumes we're in MoQ-world, and
then the "but the best way is into..." makes more sense. But I agree
that if we use "Quality" instead of "reality", then there's only one way
to make that first division.
I would also chose another word than "experience" (even if filtered) to
describe the static side. DQ is involved in every experience (Quality
event), unless it's a completely static event (as in a computer), but in
that case it's not called experience. (You would hardly call a CPU
reading a byte of memory that the CPU "experiences" the memory).
Then on to Steven:
>> 6. Static awareness. Each higher level evolved from the lower level
>> but
>> has become a discrete level. From the point of view of any level it is
>> only
>> possible to evaluate phenomena at that level.
>
> This makes no sense.
Can you elaborate on that? What doesn't make sense and why?
>> 7. Static dominance. Because each lower level is unable to evaluate
>> the
>> other levels, it considers itself to be the most moral and strives to
>> dominate the others.
>
> makes no sense.
Same as above.
>> 12. Self. The self is undivided Quality, encompassing both Dynamic and
>> static patterns. As with Quality, the self is both one and many.
>
> I don't think that this is what RMP means by the self.
I can agree that the last sentence is a bit cryptic, but regardless of
what RMP may or may not mean, what do *you* disagree with.
Regards,
Magnus
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
