HI Magnus, all old-timers, Ron, Chris, anyone I missed, >Then on to Steven: >>> 6. Static awareness. Each higher level evolved from the lower level >>> but >>> has become a discrete level. From the point of view of any level it is >>> only >>> possible to evaluate phenomena at that level. >> >> This makes no sense. > >Can you elaborate on that? What doesn't make sense and why?
Steve: I was referring to "from the point of view of any level." I agree with higher levels evolving from lower levels. >>> 7. Static dominance. Because each lower level is unable to evaluate >>> the >>> other levels, it considers itself to be the most moral and strives to >>> dominate the others. >> >> makes no sense. > >Same as above. Steve: It's the same issue. Levels don't themselves evaluate anything, they are categories for types of patterns of value. I think all the personification of levels that goes on here is muddling the MOQ. > >>> 12. Self. The self is undivided Quality, encompassing both Dynamic and >>> static patterns. As with Quality, the self is both one and many. >> >> I don't think that this is what RMP means by the self. > >I can agree that the last sentence is a bit cryptic, but regardless of >what RMP may or may not mean, what do *you* disagree with. Steve: I think that the MOQ says that an individual is composed of all four levels with the ability to respond to DQ. The patterns have Lila rather than Lila possessing patterns. Number 12 seems to make the self primary reality by equating it with Quality. Regards, Steve Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
