Platt, MOQers

Platt wrote:

> There may be a better system than a free market. But since it's more
> Dynamic that other systems,  I wonder what a better system might be. I'm
> open to suggestions. But most suggestions I've heard involve government
> interference in the free market so that some of its Dynamism is lost, and
> evolution suffers..

Chris rages:

This is why I abhor your use of the MOQ so. You speak of Dynamic Evolution, 
and the dynamic aspect of free market and how government control is always 
evil because a totally free market is more dynamic.

But Dynamic Evolution for whom I must ask!

Dynamic Evolution for it's own sake? Well, perhaps, we may theorize that 
such is the way of the universe, but what you doesn't seem to put in your 
equation, and what I refuse to leave out of mine is mankind.  See; something 
may be a very Dynamic thing, and yet not Good for mankind. To put it in 
practical terms, I would say that even though a regulated market may not 
always be as Dynamic as a completely free one, it will work more FOR man, 
not AGAINST man, it will not be that thing above peoples heads that they 
have no control over, and that can kill them of at any Dynamic turn, but it 
will be (and IS even today if you compare our two countries) a thing that is 
Good for humans, create a more HUMAN climate. And still - the Dynamic aspect 
isn't lost, not at all, development continues, but this way, we can make 
sure that we try to develop for mankind's sake, not only for Dynamic 
Development s sake alone.


I'd like to say to everybody, that while one can theorize about the MOQ in 
larger terms then just human terms, the MOQ is an invention by man, for man, 
and if it produces a view of things that isn't really concerned with man, or 
even anti-human - It will be seen as having very Low Value, and it will 
fail.

Regards

Chris 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to