On Tuesday 15 April 2008 12:12 AM Chris alarms all: <snip>
I'd like to say to everybody, that while one can theorize about the MOQ in larger terms then just human terms, the MOQ is an invention by man, for man, and if it produces a view of things that isn't really concerned with man, or even anti-human - It will be seen as having very Low Value, and it will fail. Regards Chris Hi Chris an all: I do not like the word ³dynamic² when applied to evolution. To talk positively or negatively about the undefined is meaningless. I prefer the word ³conscious². I accept that there is much in my behavior that I am not conscious of, so for me ³conscious² includes the undefined as ignorance. The defined part of my behavior is ³mechanical². ³Culture hands me a set of glasses². I act mechanically from culture. I may have a relationship to the planet on which I live of which I may be unaware. The relationship is undefined and I can be persuaded to wake up. The MOQ tells me to wake up. Joe On 4/15/08 12:12 AM, "Christoffer Ivarsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to say to everybody, that while one can theorize about the MOQ in > larger terms then just human terms, the MOQ is an invention by man, for man, > and if it produces a view of things that isn't really concerned with man, or > even anti-human - It will be seen as having very Low Value, and it will > fail. > > Regards > > Chris Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
