> [Krimel]
> By conflating Quality and DQ we in effect remove
> Quality from the MoQ.
> [Arlo]
> I don't like it either. If we say the DQ-SQ split is
> the primary
> division of Quality, then how can DQ and Quality be
> the same thing?
> What is Quality in LILA if the Quality of ZMM is the
> DQ of LILA? What
> is the Quality that DQ is a division of?
SA: I see dq as the quality of ZMM. I also see
static quality the quality of ZMM. How I orient
myself is the question, "What is Quality?", Pirsig
asked and the answer to this question seemed infinite,
if not infinite through and through. Here's the
orientation of mine as follows:
The question "What is Quality?" is unanswerable
or in other words, has no final answer, that's the
dynamic aspect of Quality. The answer given to this
question of Quality is the static aspect of Quality.
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
