Bo:
> It catches it in a nutshell and makes the assertion
> that the MOQ
> is an intellectual pattern absurd. I leave Arlo
> here, but then
> Perella said he didn't understand the problem, the
> MOQ wasn't
> (only) intellect, but the whole static range plus
> the dynamic. If this
> means that he (Perella) doesn't regard the MOQ an
> intellectual
> pattern?? No, one seems able to admit that I'm
> right, but just
> disappears behind fogscreens.
SA: Bo, your right. But where I have disagreed with
you from the start is your defining of the
intellectual level as s/o only. I disagree with that
assertion. Also, to name dynamic quality a meta-level
defines dynamic quality, and this can't happen, so I
agree with what Marsha asserted to you earlier.
I don't know anybody here, on this forum, that
think's the moq is only on the intellectual level.
The moq is an intellectual pattern on the intellectual
level, but this intellectual pattern of the moq is one
level shortsighted due to three other levels existing
that the intellectual level can't be. Also, this
intellectual pattern of the moq misses out on dynamic
quality, which is significant in the whole moq (not
the intellectual pattern of the moq).
getting grayer,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
