> SA previously:
> I see dq as the quality of ZMM. I also see static
> quality the quality of
> ZMM. How I orient myself is the question, "What is
> Quality?", Pirsig asked
> and the answer to this question seemed infinite, if
> not infinite through and
> through. Here's the orientation of mine as follows:
> The question "What is Quality?" is unanswerable or
> in other words, has no
> final answer, that's the dynamic aspect of Quality.
> The answer given to
> this question of Quality is the static aspect of
> Quality.
>
> [Krimel]
> So when you say that the question "What is Quality?"
> has no final answer; I
> say perhaps but if we share and experience and I
> ask, "Was that Quality?"
> you could probably give a definitive answer and give
> it in terms of the high
> or low Value you found in the experience.
SA: Sure can. My pointing out of the no final answer
of Quality is that we could have another experience
and another, another, another, and then maybe we stop
having these experiences when we die, but I only know
life so experience is all I know.
Krimel:
> Frankly, I think SQ actually IS betterness. To the
> extent that something is
> fixed, it can be counted on. It is stabile. It is
> foundational. It can be
> taken for granted. We can stop worrying about it. To
> my way of thinking it
> just doesn't get any better than that.
SA: Until tomorrow when I wake up, especially if it's
Friday.
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
