[Ham]> As I see it, there are two major fallacies in Pirsig's philosophy. The>
first is that a psycho-emotional response to something of value logically>
qualifies as the primary, undifferentiated reality. The second is that> the
intellect is not indigenous to the cognizant individual.
If these are fallacies, they're not Pirsig's. "A psycho-emotional response to
something of value" is NOT "the primary, undifferentiated reality." The
response is TO the primary, undifferentiated reality.
Secondly, when two people share an idea, it doesn't mean that they both don't
have it.
Craig
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
