Ron,
I'm contemplating this. I'll get back to this
post.
SA
--- Ron Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SA: I agree with what your saying Ron. I like the
> points your making. I find your angle on this
> helpful. If you came up with a list of hang-ups on
> this forum currently, ones founded on misconceptions
> and not intentional ignorance that motives certain
> old
> tea swishers, it would be helpful too.
>
> Ron;
>
> One common misconception is to view SQ/DQ in S/O
> terms.
> Giving rise to the perception that they are separate
> entities
> Ie. DQ acting upon SQ, or DQ animating, driving or
> empowering SQ.
> Rather than an alteration in the rules that define
> experience.
>
> Two, is viewing the 4 levels in the same way, so
> they are perceived
> As separate levels in struggle rather than active
> distinctions of
> An active whole. (this ties in with the above
> misconception)
>
> Third is seeing better-ness as an entity rather than
> a function.
> Better-ness is aligning ourselves with Quality.
> Since the term
> "Quality" means Reality we focus on pre-intellectual
> awareness.
> Leaving "better-ness" undefined. Therefore reality
> is the standard
> for MoQ morality and its base in certainty.
>
> There's three good ones for starters.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
