To whom it may concern, Since the MoQ is based on talk about static patterns of value I have always found it curious that so little attention is paid to this word.
Since people are sloppy about attributing who said what in previous posts, I don't know who chimed in with this from Wiki: > B) a regular and intelligible form or sequence discernible > in certain actions or situations I think this reveal three critical aspects of "patterns" First is that they have form. They occupy space; whether it is physical or conceptual space. Second they involve sequence. They have a temporal dimension. This can be a matter of order of occurrence as in music or a matter of duration. Third they are intelligible, discernable. They are not strictly speaking properties or entities. They are not TiTs. They are perceptual attributes that intelligent entities discover and share. I would add to this that pattern recognition is the evolutionary niche that our species exploits like no other. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
