mythopoeic....
or mythopoetic.

mythos precedes logos.
mythos *grounds* logos.
without the mythos the logos is isolated from truth.

philosophical/scientific/abstract thought (logos) is
dependent on 'mythopoeic thought' (mythos) for it to
have any value - it is the mythopoetic resonance of
any statement that reveals truth. truth is felt.

a mythopoetic interpretation is a *creative
interpretation*. the interpretation creates a new way
of experiencing truth.

in times past our myths were passed on through the
generations, keeping us in contact with truth and
informing/cohering the collective. this situation is
stable...but maybe too stable.

in any case that stability has been eroded - over the
last 400 years especially, though it began long before
then. it was around 400 years ago that the logos began
declaring its (imaginary) independence from the mythos
and this declaration, genuinely inspired by champions
of free thought, has hamstrung efforts to integrate
meaning within our logocentric worldview.... because
meaning is only disclosed through the mythopoetic
resonance of the logos.

creation requires destruction. the two, as with all
polar pairs, are inseparable. the myths of old had to
be dispensed with, forgotten, discredited, for new
myths to be created. the pseudo-independent logos has
helped us forget....we have lost touch with our myths
and this is the root cause of alienation. but it is
also a catalyst for a new phase in myth creation. 

the mythopoetic interpretation *of our own lives* is
this new phase and this is what joseph campbell talks
about in his final 'masks of god' volume - 'creative
mythology'. 

alienation leaves us alone, lost, confused. we are
unanchored. the rules we are given to live by ring
hollow. they do not originate from the mythos; rather
they are the product of a steroidally inflated and
consequently paranoid logos.

the ego is the psycho-societal tool that keeps us in
our place - the ego is the egregor in miniature. but
the unanchored logos - in its crazy, inspired
flailings - is undermining its erstwhile ally. 

life becomes such a challenge that the ego becomes an
impediment to survival...indeed the human question is
now very simple: evolution or extinction. evolution
entails evolving beyond the ego, into the
transpersonal psycho-sociology of the superego, and
also back into the iddish ground from whence we came.
a unification.

this unification is creative. creation can only occur
through unity. spontaneity is the mode of creativity
and spontaneity is dynamic - non-dual.

we can now create/interpret our own lives, perpetually
attuned to the mythopoetry of life.

this is the end of time. 










om> wrote:

>      Hello, since we're in a mythological mood, and
> I'm currently doing some personal inquiry into
> ghosts
> that has overlapped into myths I came upon this
> word: 
> mythopoeic (myth-making).  Wikipedia defines this
> term
> as "pre-philosophical thought" differing from
> current
> modern thought which is "philosophical, impersonal,
> abstract, and scientific".  How might the moq define
> mythopoeic?  Here's a quote with a link to the site:
> 
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythopoeic_thought
> 
> 
> 
>       "The term mythopoeic means "myth-making" (from
> Greek muthos, "myth", and poiein, "to create"). A
> group of Near Eastern specialists used the term in
> their 1946 book The Intellectual Adventure of
> Ancient
> Man: An Essay on Speculative Thought in the Ancient
> Near East, later republished as the 1949 paperback
> Before Philosophy: The Intellectual Adventure of
> Ancient Man.[1] In this book's introduction, two of
> the specialists, Henri and Mrs. H. A. Frankfort,
> argue
> that mythopoeic thought characterizes a distinct
> stage
> of human thought that differs fundamentally from
> modern, scientific thought. Mythopoeic thought, the
> Frankforts claim, was concrete and personifying,
> whereas modern thought is abstract and impersonal:
> more basically, mythopoeic thought is
> "pre-philosophical", while modern thought is
> "philosophical".[2] Because of this basic contrast
> between mythopoeic and modern thought, the
> Frankforts
> often use the term "mythopoeic thought" as a synonym
> for ancient thought in general."
> 
> 
> SA
> 
> 
>       
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 



      Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address.
www.yahoo7.com.au/mail
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to