Quoting Arlo Bensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [Platt] > But to the extent that one follows Dynamic Quality, which is > undefinable, one's behavior is free. > > [Arlo] > You've stated before that "only man responds to Dynamic Quality". > Does this mean that man's behavior is the only thing in the universe > that is not deterministic? > > If not, since you've said a cat cannot respond to Dynamic Quality, > how is his behavior "free"? Or is your cat governed strictly by > deterministic laws? > > Or are you going to say now, and agree with me, that your cat can > indeed respond to DQ (making it "free" from deterministic laws, > albeit "less free" than man whose respond to DQ includes social and > intellectual level affordances)? > > So which is it? Is your cat's behavior "free"? If so, is it because > it can "follow Dynamic Quality"? And if not, how else can it be "free"?
My cat is subject to the law of the jungle as it applies to cats and is thus constricted by that law. I presume you'll agree with me the law of the jungle is not about to change. Man, however, through society and intellect, has overcome that static law and is thus free to respond to DQ. Platt ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
