> [Arlo had asked] 
> If animals could respond to DQ in the past (DQ-animals), (1) what was the
> nature of this ability? what could they do?, (2) was there ever an overlap, a
> time when both DQ-animals and DQ-man walked the earth together? Or did
> DQ-animals in North America "lose" their DQ-ness when DQ-man appears in 
> Africa?
> (3) was there ever a time when NOTHING on the earth could respond to DQ? 
> Before
> "man", was it always that something, somewhere could respond to DQ? During the
> time of the dinosaurs, for example, what was DQ-enabled? T-rex? Lemurs? Ferns?
> (4) Extending that, before the era of animals, is your proposal that "plants"
> could respond to DQ? If not, what? If so, what is the nature of how those
> plants could "act" that they can no longer do? (5) When "cats", to use one
> example, could respond to DQ (DQ-cats), what could they do then that they can
> no longer do now? Again, speculate. Did they have "free will" when they were
> DQ-cats? And, importantly (6) why did DQ-animals lose their ability? If they
> could respond to DQ, what made them stop? Is your assumption that humans could
> one day "lose" the ability to respond to DQ? If not, why not?
> 
> Take a crack at any of these. Speculate. Guess. I don't think it'll be easy, I
> think the absurdity of the claim that "only man" responds to DQ is evident 
> here.
> 
> [Arlo now]
> Please try to answer, speculate, guess, expand upon, whatever, any of these
> questions.
> 
> [Platt]
> If you think the claim is absurd, fine. I think Pirsig makes it clear that the
> evolution of the physical and biological levels took place at the atomic and
> molecular levels...
> 
> [Arlo]
> But you said "animals could at one time respond to DQ". That's not 
> "molecular".

How else could animals respond other than at the molecular level? Do you 
think a cat  responds to DQ? If so, how would you know? What would a cat do 
to demonstrate such a response?
 
> [Platt]
> and states that now "only a living being" can respond to DQ...
> 
> [Arlo]
> The examples you cite are clearly responses to DQ contained in the social
> and/or intellectual repertoire of responses. An atom or a molecule can't "hear
> a great song for the first time". And this underscores my point. I think 
> Pirsig
> was sloppy with this. Responding to DQ, a "sense of betterness", occurs at all
> the MOQ's levels. However, each level contains constraints on how patterns can
> respond.
> 
> Pirsig would be much clearer had he said "only a living being can respond
> socially to DQ, and only "man" can respond intellectually to DQ". That makes
> perfect sense, and bypasses all the absurdities as evidenced by the questions 
> above (which you keep avoiding).

Even a cursory knowledge of evolution would inform you that your questions 
are absurd. So there is no point in answering them. They are like asking, 
"Why is a crow?" Also I find it interesting that you purport to be able to 
read Pirsig's mind and correct him as to what he really should have said -- 
like a teacher correcting a student. Somehow such a reversal of roles isn't 
convincing, especially when you live out "man" when referring to the social 
level.  

> [Platt]
> Again, if you think dice as well as rocks, ropes and roads respond to DQ, 
> fine.
> Just don't be surprised at the laughter coming from the back row of your 
> class. 
> 
> [Arlo]
> A die can respond to DQ only from within the inorganic repertoire of 
> responses.
> It can't laugh, it can't cry or think or ponder or paint or talk or dream or
> symbolically represent the experience.

Then what can it do? Or a rock? Or a rope? Or a road? I look forward to 
believable answers on how such patterns respond to DQ. 

> As for laughter, one would hope those
> who would laugh who take a crack at answering any of the questions above, only
> then would they earn the right to laugh.

Whatever that means.


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to