He hee. I didn't expect it to be "easy" to believe - as I said "I'm serious" And when did "saving face' come into it ?
Your rhetoric concerning me, is not exactly providing convincing arguments concerning the subject matter. Which is a pity. Ian On 7/22/08, david buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ian said: > At the risk of winding DMB up further, but I'm serious, I think the idea of > "rigorous" argument is part of the Giant - one reason I personally prefer > conceptual slipping - lateral thinking of sorts - and joining up dots not > otherwise connected in logical, causal ways. Traditional "rigour" grasps for > those concrete meanings. > > dmb replied: > Right. You're not a clueless, drivel-spewing weasel. You're just trying to be > free of the Giant. Yea, that ought to save face. And you can be certain that > people will believe it In fact, that's gotta be one of the most believable > things I ever heard. > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Stay in touch when you're away with Windows Live Messenger. > http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_messenger2_072008 > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
