[Bo]
Hello Stephen, pleased to meet you if we haven't spoken earlier.

[Steve]
Pleased to meet you as well.

[Bo]
I'm from the original Lila Squad times and am reeling from more
than ten years of fighting for the MOQ, yet seeing it deteriorating
every day and is why I just had a fleeting glance ate the Catholic
page you referred to on 27 July: it's about as far from the MOQ's
social LEVEL as possible.

[Steve]
I'm not trying to deteriorate the MOQ, if that's what you mean.
All I am trying to see is if these Catholic social teachings might be
an example of "good social Quality" and what intellectual values are
behind them (Gav had a thread about an intellectually-guided society,
this thread would be a comparison).

[Bo]
The real Q-social level's purpose was (still is) a dynamic revolt
against biological value of merely eating and proliferating, thus
social value was/is about checking this "jungle" existence and what
fulfills this purpose is a greater reality that transcends biological
life. Thus the proclaimed catholic human rights is about the least
Q-social value there is, they are all about the individual's
submission to the greater reality (religion most often, but can be
called "the common cause").

[Steve]
I don't think that they are about submission to some common cause,
I think they are about what should ideally happen in some interactions
that humans have with other humans, with the earth, etc...  Did Pirsig
write anything on how humans should treat other humans?

[Bo]
However, because intellectual value is the same revolt regarding
social value one of its its value aspects turns round human worth
and rights ... and THIS is what has reformed the original "raw"
social patterns to the present mellow "teachings" . The catholics
may believe that the individual's preservation is their agenda, but
the Semitic type religion are Q-social patterns and everything turns
round existence beyond, their least concern is Q-intellectual
welfare.

I won't pull the whole cultural history, but Christendom is
ambiguous with one leg in the Semitic, Q-social tradition the other
in the modern, intellectual one, Catholicism representing the
former, while Lutheranism represents the latter. Excuse my
grumpy style, but I'm aghast of how this discussion has mangled
the MOQ.

[Steve]
I'm confused, so Catholicism is an unintellectual religion? There are
no intellectual values guiding our social teachings?  Sorry again if
you think I'm trying to sabotage anything, I mean no harm.

Peace,
Steve

>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>
>>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to