> SA previously:
> I like that answer. Good answer. I understand now.
> Thanks.
> Another question, if you will. Would you say the moq
> has an axiom
> or an axiom system?
>
> Ron:
> That was it. " The accuracy of an intellectual
> understanding lies
> within it's value"
> But that really isn't an axiom of assumption; it's
> more a pearl of
> wisdom, a "philosophers stone" if you will.
> Axioms are a kind of
> absolutism, they are indicative of a sort of value
> rigidity. Drop
> axioms and value is where you recognize it.
> per your aboriginal wisdom post.
SA: Thanks Ron. I appreciate your help. I think this also shows how reality
can be explained in similar ways, maybe not exactly the same way (the
explanation), but with similar results or ground of understanding. This is
also why the moq espouses an understanding that is Amerindian, eastern asian,
and western, etc... It is also how I can get from quiet woods to an
understanding that you have with your language/grammar understanding. We are
not restricted to using these ways, but you see what I mean. It also has to do
with how Campbell discussed a monomyth. Etc..., etc...
Thanks again.
quiet, formless
woods, form,
SA
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
