Hi Ian

Good add, all this stuff about reason, experience, empiricism,
imagination, testing, authority,  revelation are different basis of belief.

DM

Yes it should DM, agreed.

I said "understanding the actual disagreement is part of finding out
.... etc..."

I would add one more general item to your list ....

Differences in the "basis of belief" / "basis of understanding"

I wouldn't use "irrational" for the "feeling" based understandings,
the emotional ones, but these do tend to be the ones concerned with
the participants themselves rather than their arguments.

Ian

On 8/23/08, David M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Ian/SA

Should not disagrement aim to reach an understanding of
where the difference is. What sort of differences? These maybe:

Different experience
Different values
Different interpretation/value of experience
Different split between possible/impossible
Different definitions
Irrational feelings of difference when there is none (DMB)

anything else?

DM



>
> Hi SA, must have missed it ... interesting question.
>
> Of course I value disagreement over matters of substance, it's an
> opportunity to find new agreement ... and "keep the dialogue going"
> whilst we do so. I can't believe I've ever said anything like "and
> we'll all agree" ... 'cos I certainly don't believe that ... that
> would be like "agreeing to disagree", which is only ever a temporary
> "holiday" in pragmatic terms.
>
> There are certain kinds of disagreement that I generally avoid /
> object to, particularly by e-mail, better over a beer or a walk in the
> woods. Two main kinds ....
>
> (1) Negative accusations over the integrity, motives and personal
> character of your interlocutor. These are ad hominem attacks - a
> no-no. Should be moderated.
>
> (2) Debates that start from political ideological premises. Which I
> tend to avoid rather than object too, just a matter of preference ...
> not enough time in the world in my mind to progress these beyond
> sloganizing, slanging-matches, unless the intelocutor shows intent to
> drop lay the ideological points aside from the argument.
>
> Basically, it's a question of motive SA. My motive in argumentation is
> to find something, anything, worth agreeing, adding value to the
> world, not to "avoid" argument or explanation. I avoid (some)
> arguments that look unlikley to add any value, for practical reasons
> of bandwidth and sanity.
>
> As I have said before Mary Parker-Follett, would be my archetype, in
> my position on the subject of disagreement and argumentation. Hope
> that helps. What was the context of your original question ?
> Ian
>
> On 8/22/08, Heather Perella
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ian,
> >
> > I recently had a question for you, but heard no response. Don't > > know
if you saw it or not.  I asked you (since your a proponent of a certain
middle way) if you value disagreement, or if it goes against your grain? I
know you like to say stuff like 'dialog long enough and we'll find we all
agree', and seem to be against people disagreeing with each other on this
forum.  Curious.
> >
> >
> > SA
> >
> >
> > --- On Fri, 8/22/08, Ian Glendinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote:
> >
> > > From: Ian Glendinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: Re: [MD] For Bo
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Date: Friday, August 22, 2008, 5:02 AM
> > > Actually, Ron, SA,
> > >
> > > Godel's argument concerns any formal system of logic
> > > (not just
> > > mathematics per se) ... but it doesn't change your
> > > point, since the
> > > argument was part of the debate about whether mathematics
> > > and logic
> > > resolve to the same thing.
> >
> n it is only a rarely used and one of
>
>
> > > many,
> > > > methods of reasoning.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > > >
> > >
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > > > Archives:
> > > >
> > >
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > > > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> > > >
> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > >
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > > Archives:
> > >
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
> >
> >
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> >
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
> >
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
>


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to