Ian said:
...Godel is not irrelevant to explaining why moral philosophies can never
be (logically) complete and consistent.
dmb says:
Man, that just kills me. Only a philosophical tyrant could make as
assertion like that. You'd have to be a hyper-rationalist and even more
insane than Hegel. Logic itself is not logically complete and consistent,
let alone any moral philosophy. Exploring the possibilities and limits of
intellect is one of the central points of the MOQ, no? And doesn't that
exploration make these kinds of assertions seem thoroughly implausible?
Even ridiculous? I think so.
Ian says: moral philosophy cannot be both complete and consistent
DMB says: how can you say that, I agree, but how can you say that, logic
can't show that, no if you want to say that you have to
mention the MOQ, otherwise you can't join the cult.
DM says: DMB is incomplete and never consistent. But keep working on it DMB
there's always hope/DQ/potential, even for you.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
