[Marsha] Gee, and I thought this was a forum to explore and discuss the MOQ in all its many aspects.
[Arlo] Ron mentioned "caring", and I think that misses the mark. I, too, care greatly about the issues discussed her. And I care deeply about the experiences I have when riding the woods of PA. Indeed, I'd argue that the investiture we have in negotiating an identity here reflects the care we bring to the table. Ron: AH here we are, the "investiture we have in negotiating an identity here reflects the care we bring to the table." this is what I'm on about not about avatars generally, or pseudonyms, like I stated I'm o.k. with it, I'm hip, but it's this investiture I'm concerned with mostly. The accountability issue, when we engage with another here we build relationships, when someone flips to a fictional character from a ficticious place in the middle of a conversation as a device, it comes off a bit disingenuous, It violates the investiture and brings the amount of care into question. When it is used like mr. Hat as a device to act out without accountability I begin to question the intent. like in the life of Brian when the peoples front of Judea wanted to fight for the right of men to have babies, "but men can't HAVE babies" " it symbolizes our struggle against oppression," reg says: more like symbolizing your struggle against reality" likewise avatars without investiture of care can either be seen as symbols of the struggle against identity or as symbols of the users struggle with integrity. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
