[Ron]
The accountability issue, when we engage with another here we build
relationships, when someone flips to a fictional character from a
ficticious place in the middle of a conversation as a device, it
comes off a bit disingenuous, It violates the investiture and brings
the amount of care into question.
[Arlo]
I can't speak for Krimel, but he's never been one I'd say doesn't
care. Your point is taken, of course, I just don't read that much
into Krim's altering personae, maybe because "identity" is a such a
fascinating issue for me.
[Ron]
likewise avatars without investiture of care can either be seen as
symbols of the struggle against identity or as symbols of the users
struggle with integrity
[Arlo]
I'd only say again that we are always in some form of "avatarness".
You can never not have a mask on, Ron. At least as how I see it.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
