At 12:42 PM 9/12/2008, you wrote:
[Marsha]
To me a self is not one and not many.

[Arlo]
If there is only "one" at the expense of others being "unreal", then it is hardly a fiction. You can't have it both ways. You are clearly advocating a "real self" one should "be honest" about. And you clearly tie this "real self" to the physiological body it inhabits. All well and good, but this way the self ceases to a fiction.

The self is an ever-changing, collection of overlapping, interrelated, inorganic, biological, social and intellectual, static patterns of value. It is not a thing. It is a process.



[Marsha]
Self is a process.  Being honest is also a process.

[Arlo]
Honesty about what? You keep pointing to irrelevencies. I keep saying that the only "honesty" is what we both agree to be true. I present who I am, you either accept that or reject it. If you try to find "dishonesty" in this process by referring out to a physiological form, or referring out to "other selves" that share my gray matter, then you are mistaking illusion for reality.

Who is to say what is irrelevant?



[Marsha]
I don't think I need to point it out. At the moment I'm in the process of being suspicious. And I have explained to you why. What would be the odds of such a coincidence?

[Arlo]
At any given moment, we always make the best possible choice from among the information we find valuable. I don't right care that you think "SA", "Krimel" and "Arlo" share the same biological form. I expect when Horse tells you otherwise you'll rescind, unless of course "Horse" is another variation of "Arlo". How could you trust that he is not? Maybe he is. Maybe everyone here is all "variations of Arlo" and you are interacting with one person "pretending" to be everyone else. You can walk around in a paranoid state about all kinds of things all your life, if you so choose. I mean, what "evidence" do I have that "Marsha", "Platt" and "Joe" are not "variations of a theme"? What "evidence" do I have that your gender matches your physiological body, and let me ask what evidence could I have that you could not fake? Indeed, what evidence does anyone else here have that "Arlo" and "Marsha" are also not variations. A phone number? They can be rerouted very easily. A voice? I can find a woman easily to "be" Marsha on the phone. A photo on a website? C'mon, that's about as fake-able as pie. A meeting in person? If I can find a female voice, I can easily hire a female actress to "be you". If people believe "Marsha" and "Arlo" to be physiologically discrete, or not, is their own hang-ups based on how these read our presentations here.

Now you're being silly.



[Marsha]
Orange and blue are colors dependent on eyes, seeing and a visual object. How one feels is something else. One could easily say "I'm the color blue, but feeling orange?" That would be the process of being honest.

[Arlo]
No, being honest would be saying, "I am the color orange, regardless of the pigment in my physiological form". When you buy me a dress, you base the color NOT on "what color Arlo is" but "what color is Arlo's body". They are two different things. To conflate them is a mistake.

Right. You and Zeus are going to tell me what is a mistake. There's not a bunny's butt chance that's going to happen.



[Marsha]
I don't know how many average people would actually agree with what you described. I think it is far too abstract. Either way 'continuity across time' and 'continuity across context' is illusion. Cultural glasses.

[Arlo]
What is an "average" person? Just curious. And if you did really believe that "continuity across time" and "continuity across context" is illusion, you would not have began this post saying "To me a self is not one and not many", for this says that these are not illusions at all, but that there is one self that transcends time and context.

An "average" person is a good-hearted, hard-working average citizen. I do not recognized your interpretation of my opening comment.



[Marsha]
You may be at the University too long.

[Arlo]
Fair enough. Maybe I do overestimate the intelligence of people by thinking they can understand and handle complex thoughts.

Or maybe you mistake quantity of words for quality of thought.



[Marsha]
Culture and language are structured for a self that is independent with a body and mind, and a gender association. Okay, add soul. "One body, one mind and one soul", yet thought to be one independent agent.

[Arlo]
Well this is my point. These things are not "real", just social conventions. There is no "self" that exists across contexts. But we structure our activity that way for social reasons. Culture sees "body, mind and soul" as fixed, connected and continuous over time and place. Seen this way, there is one real "Arlo", who's "honest" reality is bound to his physiological form, and who may "pretend" to be other people but is really the same old Arlo. I deny this view, and indeed I find it horribly problematic when you really examine it.

Huh!  Want to untangle this paragraph?  What exactly do you deny?




[Marsha]
I do not know how you got to this place, and where "realness" came from. I'm defending 'wanting honesty in communication'.

[Arlo]
Explain to me, please, how I can be "honest" about something that has no reality? Your demanding "honesty" points to something "real" as opposed to something "pretend". I may "pretend to be a boy" or "pretend to be SA", but the realness is that I am "one girl" pretending to be both. You base the honesty of SA or Arlo on something you define as "real". You cling to an illusion. You say words rather than believe them.

I cling to many illusions. They keep me floating and out of a sanitarium. Doesn't mean I believe them.



[Marsha quote Meredith Brooks]
I'm a bitch, I'm a lover...

[Arlo]
Exactly. You are a plurality. A multiplicity. Any suggestion of a "singular" Marsha behind all these various faces is an illusion. Any suggestion that there is a "reality" behind "what you want to be" is an illusion.

Dah...

But I still, in conventional conversation, expect honesty. And if I don't get it, I might think you are lacking arete. :-P



I'm an Arlo, I'm an SA
I'm a Horse, I'm a Marsha...

Whatever you want it to be, for you that's what it will be. (Arlo quotes Johnny Lydon)


And remember, no matter where you go, there you are.  ~Confucius




.
.

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to