> Slaves were and are society without money. > > Micah Right on. And to the degree you are taxed on your income, you are a slave - forcibly denied from possessing the fruits of your labor. The income tax is a low quality social pattern designed to redistribute wealth on the Marxist principle of "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." Platt
Not sure what you mean by relating income tax to slavery. Did you read my post on the Aussie doctor? There are people that are denied access to even having the possibility of creating any fruits of labour; some because of their religion, some because of the colour of their skin, some because of a disability or disease. I'm sure there are other reasons used. I realised at the time that this 'idea' of a moneyless society would provoke reactions but I am a little surprised at the arguments and observations used to dismiss even this idea. SOM has created many vested interests it seems. This idea was set in the context of the financial crisis going on. It seems there are a lot of people out there who consider money, which is only a social pattern of benefit, as the DQ and SQ in one. Hauling it in by the millions whilst at the same time playing dangerous games with the fruits of labour of countles more people for whom it means something completely different. And seeing it go up in smoke. I'd rather be my own slave than owned by capital. Who is/are dreaming? Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
