Well, at least Platt and Arlo can completely agree that their fellow man can't be trusted. How to control others is where they differ. Although I still believe this is a comedy routine and that "they" are indeed one. I have always enjoyed the - "mildly amusing to annoying to extremely annoying to completely hilarious" joke structure.
Micah -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Bensinger Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 4:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [MD] Here come the censors [Platt] As usual, absurdities and distortions hurled down from an ivory tower fantasyland. [Arlo] Gee, Platt evades the questions by tossing out moronic right-wing squalking points... go figure. Try this instead... where do YOU draw the line on weapon ownership, Platt? Should civilians be able to own missiles and tanks? No? Yes? What about grendaes? Bazookas? If you DO draw a line, on what reason is it based? (Answers or talk-radio stupidity, which will it be???) [Platt] Thanks for providing an example of a typical left-wing loon. Do you support defending the U.S. against terrorist attacks?. [Arlo] So you support Britain's databasing of emails if its used to protect us against terrorist attacks? And let me get this straight... you DO support the Patriot Act, isn't that right? [Platt] So we mustn't say a critical word about the Messiah Obama although it was perfectly OK to spew ridicule, anger and hate at Bush for 8 years and even now, after the election, against Palin? You break me up. [Arlo] Follow me closely here. I know the concept is hard for you. Yes. We MUST be critical of Obama. But just like your other boohooing, I find it sad and laughable that after 8 years of dismissing ALL criticisms of Bush as "Bush-bashing", you suddenly now feel YOUR criticisms should be validated. The point here is the sad irony, as for 8 years you laughed off Bush critics as "Bush-bashers", so tell me why you should not be laughed off now as an "Obama-basher"? You deserve exactly what you gave. Nothing more. Just like you boohoo about how Palin is treated, all the while spewing the most virtriolic and moronic of attacks against Obama. You want it both ways, and that doesn't fly. You, and Palin, deserve to be treated exactly as you treat others. [Platt] Your arguments are as hilarious as your justifications for going around town naked as jay bird. [Arlo] An argument that underscored your gross hypocrisy, Mr. Freedom-Fighter. Too bad you had nothing of substance to offer that conversation, and resorted instead to a string of moronic soundbites of "commie, lib, Marxist" bullshit. If that changed, I'd be happy to review the idea of personal freedom and the human body again, but since your concept of "freedom" stops with "freedom to be like me" I don't expect it'd go anywhere. (I still have that entire thread in my archives, I'd be happy to repost it.) But tell me again why the government should be able to force a woman to conceal her breasts in public? Which of these do you want to go with (1) to protect her, (2) because boobies are dirty, (3) women's bodies belong to men, (4) you need the government to protect you from images that would make you want to cheat on your wife? Or supply another.. it'll be a fun conversation to watch you dig yourself into another hole. What's funny is... you support banning nudity in a thread you started called "here comes the censors"... I don't think that irony is lost on anyone... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
