[Micah] You question is patently absurd - representing the most ridiculous extreme possible, and my question was to ascertain your basic position on human morality.
[Arlo] You accused me of seeking control over others with my stance on drawing a line on weapon ownership. I wanted to see if you yourself are guilty of the same accusation. I take it you are. [Micah] You have a choice to either; assume humans are basically good or basically evil. Why do you choose the latter? It is your choice. [Arlo] I think humans are basically good, but this does not mitigate evil that men do. And such weapons being sold readily at BoxMart would only serve the evil in man. So now I ask again, since you seem to be back on your high horse... if you assume man is basically good, then do you draw NO line on weapon ownership? Or do you? If you DO draw a line, Micah, I ask you why? Can you answer that? [Micah] Nor do I feel the need to draw imaginary "lines" for others. I'm busy enough with my own life. [Arlo] So, to clarify, you would have NO limits or restrictions on the weapons civilians can purchase in the market? Tanks, missiles, nuclear weapons, all fair game.... And if you say NO to any of these, then Micah my friend you most certainly do draw a line for others. So... line or no line, Micah. Even if its at the extreme of nuclear weapons, do you draw it or not? If so, why? I've answered your questions twice now, think you can give me a straightforward answer? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
