Greetings Ham,

I was just wondering if you, per chance, were taught rhetoric at the same schools as Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke?


Marsha



At 02:29 AM 12/13/2008, you wrote:

Craig [Arlo mentioned]:


Let's recap (as Arlo would say).
You said: all LOGICAL propositions are based on
the relational system we call existence.
I said: EMPIRICAL propositions.
You replied: ALL propositions, EXCEPT (drum roll)
a LOGICAL proposition (A=A).
Your position is confusing.

I don't see the confusion. The expression "A = A" defines an identity, not a relation, so it's not really a logical proposition. I used it only to demonstrate that propositions are in the form of "A causes B" or "1 + 2 = 3" or "if this, then that". In other words, they express relational possibilities, effects, axioms, etc., all of which involve differentiated entities or integers. The absolute (Essence) is non-relational and undifferentiated, so it lies outside the category of logical propositions.

[Ham]:
...scientists and geneticists...explain the process [of consciousness]
in terms of biological evolution.  But that's "cause-and-effect",
the experiential worldview of empiricism, not philosophy.

[Craig]:
Yes, consciousness must be explained as an experience.
How else?

Consciousness is often DESCRIBED as "intellect", "mind", or "sensibility" which emerges in the process of evolution. But since the capacity of conscious awareness is not a process, and consciousness itself is not an 'existent", we can't explain it as a biological event. Arlo refuses to accept anything as valid that is not empirically experienced. Only existents are real for him, so he denies the subjective self and the possibility of a reality that transcends finite existence. Since that makes it impossible to explain anything in metaphysical terms, he accuses me of refusing to define awareness and Essence as processes in time. If Value (Quality) had not been equated to Experience by Pirsig, I suspect he would be denying that, too.

I hope your mind is not also closed to metaphysical theory, Craig, although your "confusion" over my positon is not every encouraging.

Regards,
Ham

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

.
.

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to