Ron 3 Jan.you had found a new way of editing posts that makes it even more difficult to find who you speak to, but it may be me?
And these words are from where? > Make no mistake, religeon and science are competing forms of > intellectual patterns. The struggle is between older static patterns and > newer more dynamic patterns. At least they are not Pirsig's because he places religion inside the social level. Moreover there's no moral struggle inside the levels, plenty struggle - animals fight, kill and eat each other - but that's not a moral struggle. > Now if you want to say that the more dynamic intellectual patterns are > the ones that are moraly superior to those intellectual patterns which > are more static, then you have a more reliable assessment of the > situation. -ron Re. intellectual patterns I don't want to say anything about moral supremacy, but on the biological level the human species is superior because it's the carrier of social value, and on the social level the Greek culture was (at least) superior because it gave rise to intellectual level (so was the "far east" ones) while the tyrannies to this day fight against intellect. Seems like we agree here IMO Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
