Steve, DMB,
Coincidentally I am re-reading Rorty's Pilosophy and Social Hope at
the moment, (armed with much greater background knowledge on the
subjects than when I first attempted it 6 or 7 years ago), and also
finding much acknowleged building on Dewey and James. I see "avoiding
prejudicial frameworks" as Rorty's avoidance of  metaphysics. You're
gonna have to educate us DMB on which aspects of these neo-pragmatists
are "radical" and whch are not.

BTW (Bo if you're reading) the fact that the MoQ includes the basis of
its own evolution is the reason I see it as a valuable, but not
prejudicial, framework.

I'll look out for the Hildebrand book.Regards
Ian

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Steve Peterson
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi DMB,
>
> Is this the book?
> http://www.amazon.com/Beyond-Realism-Antirealism-Neopragmatists-Vanderbilt/dp/082651426X
>
> I've been looking for something to read about pragmatism. Do you think that
> Pirsig fits in with the pragmatist tradition?
>
> I just finished reading Philosophy and Social Hope by Rorty who writes a lot
> about Dewey and considers Dewey his philosophical hero or something like
> that. I was unaware that Dewey embraced James' radical empiricism. Rorty
> doesn't seem to think experience is worth talking about while Dewey
> apparently did based on your quote of Hildebrand's book. Do you know why
> Rorty is not a radical empiricist? (I suppose Matt K may be better able to
> answer.)
>
> I haven't heard much about your studies beyond that you are studying. What
> are you working on?
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to