Hi Bo,
Bo said:
I read you admonishing but feel we are reasonably open to arguments and polite.
Matt:
It wasn't really an admonishing. People can talk, write, and discuss any way
it pleases them, it's no skin off my back. Participation, naturally, is
optional. But having surveyed the scene for the better part of a decade, I've
begun to see in a wider scope the types of things that drive and derail
discussion. Like clockwork, people accuse others of not listening. Like
clockwork, every three months somebody whose taken time off, or totally new,
comes into the discussion wanting desperately to "finally move the discussion
forward."
When I first took part, the Lila's Squad years were still fresh in people's
minds, and the idea of latching down the MoQ and beginning dissemination of a
program of thought/action still seemed like a reasonable hope. Ten years
later, the hope has largely evaporated and turned into mixtures of anxiety,
hysteria and frustration.
I've spent a lot of time in recent years thinking simply about the activity and
practice of discussion, both in person, in print, and on the internet and I've
spent some time writing on the topic, trying to promote both more reflection
and different habits of participation. I don't think the MD needs an
intervention, or a referee, or an arbitrator because I'm not so presumptuous to
think that anybody needs to be doing any of this. _Because_ it is completely
optional, people should have complete and total freedom over their composition,
both in person and in writing.
But if I had to boil down to one slogan, one pithy bit of potted wisdom, the
first step to having a good conversation that has the chance of "going
somewhere," it would be this: you have to give a shit about the other person.
You have to _care_. It's pure Pirsig. You have to care about what the other
person says. Everything else falls from there, including all the stuff about
the primacy of rhetoric and the downfall of Platonism.
I have no doubt most people are comfortable with the way they compose
themselves, with their relative openness or politeness. But it isn't one's
self one should be worried about--worrying about the other person's comfort
level is what leads to good conversation.
I don't know if that's an admonition or not, but it is another interventional
suggestion. I have no wish for people to be fake, to sin against their
authenticity, who they are. But it was Socrates who taught us to wonder, from
time to time, whether or not who we are is the best "are" we could be.
On the actual topic at hand, I'm afraid I don't have much to say. It's very
difficult for me to follow you, partly because I find numerous parts
contentious and I can't tell where the important contentions are. You move too
quickly for me. But you said this--
Bo said:
Then the MOQ where he draws a Reality-Quality "box" on top and below it the
said DQ/SQ dualism This is just as wrong, DQ directly spawns the SQ.
Matt:
What you are pointing to is an ambiguity in Pirsig's terms. Quality is
supposedly different from Dynamic Quality, but when you use the same terms
("ultimate reality," "immediate experience," "undefined") to describe both, it
becomes difficult to tell how to tell the difference between the two (I talked
about this in my review of a paper Anthony wrote for the Essay Forum).
You're taking a definite stand, on both the ill-fated nature of the ambiguity
(which, if I'm not mistaken, Pirsig deliberately wanted) and the way out (it
was a mistake to have two terms at all). But your mode of enunciating your
position has almost always, and here I take comfort in what seems to be a
majority opinion, been very weird and difficult to understand.
But finally understanding your point of interception, it helps make some sense
of your general project. There are some upshots to it, but then there are some
upshots to Pirsig's apparent desires. I don't quite get incensed by the issue
the same way you do, so I don't feel pressured to make a choice. I'm content
to notice the abiguitity, and simply deal with it on a case by case basis.
I've never been much for system.
Matt
_________________________________________________________________
Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093185mrt/direct/01/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
