At 07:47 AM 2/4/2009, you wrote:
Hi Marsha,
It seems to me, religions reify experience into religious objects.
Science reifies experience into scientific objects. The MOQ seems
to point to the merit of the actual experience, and the experience
prior to concepts.
I'm not sure I understand what the point of this thread is. Are
there questions you have about the experience of red? You seem to be
unimpressed by the answers Krimel presented that science has about
red, but you haven't asked any questions beyond, what does science
say about red?
Best,
Steve
Greetings Steve,
My question was about what science tells us about the _experience_ of
red. This was just an auxiliary question. The primary question was
also about _experience_: 'It is my impression that the mystical
experience is without self and objects, in the land before
language. How does science deal with that?'
Not to worry. I'm perfectly willing to let the subject drop. I can
ponder it on my own time.
Marsha
_____________
QUESTION EVERYTHING!!!
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
