> Marsha, > It seems to me, religions reify experience into religious objects. > Science reifies experience into scientific objects. The MOQ seems to > point to the merit of the actual experience, and the experience prior > to concepts. > [Steve] I'm not sure I understand what the point of this thread is. Are there questions you have about the experience of red? You seem to be unimpressed by the answers Krimel presented that science has about red, but you haven't asked any questions beyond, what does science say about red?
[Krimel] The point of this thread was separate it from the previous thread but mostly so I could file it without mixing it in with other stuff. The real problem is that if the questions about "red" are really just about Marsha's experience of red then I would have to ask what human discipline could provide an answer? All human communication is about overlapping experience. Whether it is art and poetry or mathematics all communications is about shared experience. I can only wonder that anyone would ask another for an explanation of their own personal experience? It seems like a non-starter and no answer would suffice. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
