> > > > > > >[Marsha]
> > > > > > >Within the MOQ, theism, god and religion are static patterns of
> > > > > > > value.
> > > > > > >[Krimel]
> > > > > > >What is a static pattern?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Marsha:
> > > > > >A conceptual construct, or a static pattern of value.  Do you
like
> > > >paradox?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >[Krimel]
> > > > > >What is a conceptual construct?
> > > > >
> > > > >[Marsha]
> > > > >Why don't you tell me.  You know you want to...
> > > > >
> > > > >[Krimel]
> > > > >Sounds like just a thought.
> > > >
> > > >Marsha
> > > >A mental construct, a static pattern of value.
> > > >
> > > >[Krimel]
> > > >Constructed of what?
> > >
> > >Marsha
> > >Constructed of emptiness which dependent arising.
> > >
> > >[Krimel]
> > >"Constructed" of emptiness? Emptiness arising? Dependant on what?
> >
> >[Marsha]
> >Dependent arising:
> >
> >This is the understanding that any phenomenon exists only because of
> >the existence of other phenomena in an incredibly complex web of
> >cause and effect covering time past, time present and time future.
> >This concept of a web is symbolized by Indra's net, a
> >multidimensional spider's web on which lies an infinite amount of dew
> >drops or jewels, and in these are reflected the reflections of all
> >the other drops of dew ad infinitum.
> >
> >Stated in another way, everything depends on everything else. A human
> >being's existence in any given moment is dependent on the condition
> >of everything else in the world at that moment, but in an equally
> >significant way, the condition of everything in the world in that
> >moment depends conversely on the character and condition of that
> >human being. Everything in the Universe is interconnected through the
> >web of cause and effect such that the whole and the parts are
> >mutually interdependent. The character and condition of entities at
> >any given time are intimately connected with the character and
> >condition of all other entities that superficially may appear to be
> >unconnected or unrelated.
> >
> >[Krimel]
> >But if it's all just concepts from whence do they arises? Other concepts?
> >And where do they reside? More concepts? What sort of "existence" are you
> >talking about? What is a phenomenon?
>
>Marsha
>All conventional phenomena are conceptually designated, depending for
>whatever identity and existence they have on such designation (static
>pattern of value), and that this merely imputed status is their
>ultimate nature.
>
>[Krimel]
>So conventional phenomena are more concepts? But they have an ultimate
>nature beyond being concepts?

[Marsha]
Things from there own side are free from imputation.  Nothing can be 
said from their side.

[Krimel]
Which side is which? A thing? I thought there were no things, just concepts?
Which side can nothing be said from? Who or what would do the imputing?



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to