Ron:
My way demands nothing, as I stated, if you desire to define your expereince in
terms
of God, thats your choice, if it brings meaning and value to your own expereince
and it works for you, great. I however do not, I have my own way of defining
expereince
and meaning, and thats the whole point of the arguement. MoQ typically follows
the school of Pragmatism on this score. Each person decides for themselves what
is meaningful. Doling out meaning for others is the problem.
The one that is sensed in your arguement.
The beauty of Moq is this has no conflict, it is a non issue. It incorporates
theist and atheist
alike, I am neither a theist nor an atheist or an anti-theist, I'm not out to
fix THE world
I'm out to fix MY world and none of those concepts figure into what I deal with
on a daily
basis.
MoQ simply says that it all begins with you. With each individual paying more
attention
to their own lives and how they are linked to and effect others.
> Ron:
> It simply comes down to a matter of opinion, You and Michael need
> a god in your lives, pure and simple. Thats fine, I respect that.
> I however do not. And thats pretty much the end of it.
MO: Well, no. Its not "the end of it" if "your" way demands "our" way to step
aside in the interest of overall greater Quality. Atheists, reading Pirsig
state
MoQ is "anti-theistic", inspite of all their well-developed intellectual
capacities
leap right over the concept that MoQ being anti-theistic does not demand the
non-existence of theism for reality to function or even thrive in an MoQ
understanding of reality.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
