Hi Michael 21 Feb. you wrote:
> Bo, I'm not denying anyone any "thesis", MoQ or otherwise. Go with > what works for you. We have been discussing Pirsig's MOQ for years and disagreed and agreed in countless ways, but one thing I think we agree about is the MOQ putting traditional or formal religion - what I call "Semitic" (Judaism, Old Testament Christendom and Islam) on the social value level. If anyone joins the discussion without knowing the basics about the Dynamic/Static ordering of reality and the static levels, but just throws in a concept like "theism" without placing it in the Q system it becomes very difficult. Well I know that you discussed at length with DMB for instance so all this my admonishing may be irrelevant. > I'm here because what I understood of MoQ explained a lot to me that > had not made sense before. Problem is, the more I try to get a hold on > MoQ, the more it becomes a roadblock to my understanding. Could you expand on what of the MOQ "explained a lot" and what developed into a roadblock. Till then Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
