Ron

28 Feb.you  wrote:

> The parable of the rotisserie assembly instructions following this
> clarifies this point even more. Bo insists that there is only one way
> to assemble the rotisserie when it may be successfully be assembled in
> a variety of different ways, The instructions authority being derived
> by an arbitrary worker who is valued the least in the actual
> operating procedure.

If you mean that for instance a car can be assembled "in a variety of 
different ways" perhaps so, but it no longer can be used for 
transportation, but more an art "installation" which is the hype these 
days. But seriously you may have a point, Pirsig's "obsession" was/is 
Reality=Quality issue and he obviously thinks that the Q-reality can 
be "assembled" many ways and still be a Quality Metaphysics. He 
even says somewhere that SOM is a "moq. This is so outrageous that 
I hardly believe my eyes. No one sees the difference between a Q-
SOM and the ordinary article, however the various static levels can 
be seen as "assemblies of DQ in different ways". Yet not arbitrary, 
biological life had to follow inorganic death and society after that and 
finally intellect. This sequence is fixed be it on earth or on a planet in 
Alfa Centauri. And Pirsig must for Goodness sake have seen the 
DQ/SQ assembly as the one that makes the MOQ work and not be a 
mere "installation".

Bo









Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to