dmb says:
This "outrageous" claim is exactly what I've been trying to explain.

Andre: (dmb is referring to Bodvar's claim that Pirsig has stated that 'SOM
is an moq').
I doubt this very much. I do remember Mr. Pirsig saying that the S/O
science is a quality intellectual pattern.

dmb:
It has everything to do with the other claim we're debating, namely that the
MOQ is different from Quality it talks about.

Andre

Hi David, interesting. My reading is slightly different to yours. I
understand that Pirsig, when building his metaphysics, had to make the first
slice and he sliced Quality into two sections: DQ and SQ 'and this became
the basic division of his emerging Metaphysics of Quality.(Lila p119)
I am reading this as the MoQ NOT being 'different from the quality it talks
about'. I.e the MoQ= DQ/SQ.
I think that this is also the way Bodvar sees it (Bodvar prick your ears
please, correct me if I'm wrong!!) and the source of a lot of confusion.

For me, it clears up the pre-conceptual/ conceptual dichotomy  suggested as
being the workings of language application. Indeed we are led to believe so
but this occurs only within SOM upon which such distinctions are based and
are not only posited as such but then assumed to be Reality itself. (the 'M'
part of the SO).This fallacy is something the MoQ has exposed.

My question, David relates to this in the line where you state:' It has
everything to do with the difference between DQ and sq'.

Aren't SPOV's patterns of Quality derived from/ expressions of DQ? But have
they then lost their 'Quality' status?? Is there a difference? Isn't SQ
'patterned' DQ?
When I describe myself as a SPOV am I describing myself as a concept of
SPoV's or as the 'real' patterns? In other words, does the description
somehow makes the reality of my patterns an illusion.

What do you think?
Am I making sense?

Regards
Andre
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to